How would you say it stacks up (Aura semi) to WB Satin Impervo? The Impervo with no slicker is my speed limit; faster than that and it is going to get real ugly.
Aura Extender
Anyone have any experience with this product? I have a job where HO wants Aura semi used for the trim. I was wondering if it will be necessary to use it and/or if it is better than XIM and Floetrol. Necessary meaning that Aura is not compatible with XIM or Floetrol. I am not the fastest brush in town so I know I will have to use something. Mysearch came up with a tiny bit of info on the subject.
Thanks
Thanks
1 - 4 of 10 Posts
Could you elaborate a bit on the Aura Extender? Is it an extender only or a conditioner also? Was your comparison to WB Imp without an additive in the Impervo?I used the Aura extender with satin interior Aura today. It worked great. I compared it side by side with Waterborne Impervo and liked it better than Waterborne impervo. Flowed out better. It looks like I have a favorite new interior trim paint.
Did you try the Aura without the extender?
I am salivating for more info..........wait........just drool...asleep on keyboard.
Thanks for the info Dean. I will probably pick up a gallon and experiment too.
1 - 4 of 10 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Professional Painting Contractors Forum
A forum community dedicated to professional painters. Come join the discussion about the industry, safety, finishing, tools, machinery, projects, styles, scales, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Top Contributors this Month
View All
finishesbykevyn
53 Replies
jennifertemple
40 Replies
Holland
39 Replies
Recommended Communities
